Which input is meant to ensure that the secret concerns is actually certain and you can related
- Poggio R, Gutierrez L, Matta Milligrams, mais aussi al. Each day sodium consumption and you will CVD death in the general people: scientific feedback and you may meta-data out-of potential degree. Social Wellness Nutr. 20ID: 24848764.
- Graudal N, Jurgens Grams, Baslund B, mais aussi alpared that have usual salt consumption, low- and you may excessively-salt dieting are for the enhanced death: a meta-investigation. Was J Hypertens. 20ID: 24651634.
- Suckling RJ, The guy FJ, Macgregor GA. Altered fat loss sodium consumption to have blocking and you may treating diabetic kidney condition. Cochrane Databases Syst Rev. 2010(12):CD006763. doi: 1858.CD006763.pub2. PMID: 21154374.
- Strazzullo P, D’Elia L, Kandala NB, ainsi que al. Sodium consumption, coronary attack, and you can cardiovascular disease: meta-study away from potential studies. BMJ. 2009;339:b4567. doi: /bmj.b4567. PMID: 19934192.
- Aburto Nj, Hanson S, Gutierrez H, ainsi que al. Effect of enhanced potassium consumption into aerobic risk activities and you may problem: logical feedback and you can meta-analyses. BMJ. 2013;346:f1378. doi: /bmj.f1378. PMID: 23558164.
- Phillips R, Hanchanale Compared to, Myatt A good, mais aussi al. Citrate salts to have stopping and you can managing calcium supplements that has had kidney stones when you look at the grownups. Cochrane Databases Syst Rev. 2015(10):CD010057. doi: 1858.CD010057.pub2. PMID: 26439475.
- Dickinson HO, Nicolson DJ, Campbell F, et al. Potassium supplements towards the management of number one blood pressure levels during the grownups. Cochrane Databases Syst Rev. 2006(3):CD004641. doi: 1858.CD004641.pub2. PMID: 16856053.
- Beyer FR, Dickinson HO, Nicolson DJ, et albined calcium, magnesium and you may potassium supplements for the handling of no. 1 blood pressure from inside the grownups. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(3):CD004805. doi: 1858.CD004805.pub2. PMID: 16856060.
VIII. Post on Key Questions
[[AHRQ published the key issues toward Energetic Health care Website for public remark. The latest EPC subdued and you may finalized the primary inquiries shortly after breakdown of individuals statements, and you can input siteyi ziyaret et out-of Key Informants while the Technology Professional Committee (TEP). ]]
IX. Technology Positives
Tech Pros compensate a multiple-disciplinary gang of logical, articles, and you may methodological professionals who provide input in the determining populations, interventions, evaluations, otherwise consequences and you may select types of degree otherwise databases to search. He could be chosen to include broad systems and views particular so you can the subject below advancement. Divergent and contradictory viewpoints are typical and you can regarded as health scientific discourse you to results in a thoughtful, related scientific comment. Therefore, analysis inquiries, framework, and you can methodological ways do not necessarily portray brand new views regarding individual tech and you may content pros. Technology Experts render guidance to the EPC to understand books search tips and you may highly recommend ways to certain points as the questioned of the EPC. Technical Masters don’t would investigation of any sort nor manage it sign up to the writing of report. They have not examined this new declaration, except since considering the possible opportunity to get it done from peer or public opinion procedure.
Technology Professionals need disclose any economic problems interesting greater than $ten,100 and just about every other related organization otherwise elite problems of interest. Due to their book health-related otherwise content assistance, everyone is greeting so you can serve as Tech Gurus and those who establish that have prospective disputes could be chose. The fresh Also and also the EPC work to balance, create, or decrease any potential problems of interest identified.
X. Fellow Writers
[[Peer writers is desired to add authored comments toward draft declaration centered on their medical, blogs, otherwise methodological possibilities. The fresh EPC considers the peer opinion comments into draft statement in preparation of your last statement. Fellow writers do not participate in writing or modifying of your last declaration or any other items. The final declaration will not always portray the brand new viewpoints out of private reviewers. The newest EPC often complete a temper of all peer feedback statements. Brand new state of mind off comments to possess clinical recommendations and you will tech briefs have a tendency to be composed three months following book of your research statement.